Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 23:47:34 GMT -5
Surrounding himself only with the most loyal and despising, if not removing and purging, any critical element. - Highlight the accumulation of proposals without clarity or consistency. The defense of public services was buried under a program (Manifesto) overloaded with debatable promises (the -day work week or free broadband, for example. - Highlight Corbyn's clumsiness, lack of definition and ambiguity on Brexit . The position favorable to leaving Europe was corrected with the defense of another referendum but without establishing a position: he did not satisfy either remainers or leavers.
In The New Statesman (publication located to the left of The Guardian. The writer and documentary filmmaker Paul Mason dissects Corbyn's errors and clumsiness and calls for Iraq Telegram Number Data convergence not only between the different currents of the party, but also with the liberal center to stop the national-populists in the municipal elections next spring. The aligned sectors that dominate the parliamentary bloc, more or less with Blairism , feel mistreated by Corbyn since , admit that the internal disputes over Brexit have influenced the result (it would be impossible to deny it), but they downplay this factor or They consider it secondary to the leadership style.
The moderates point to Corbyn as responsible for the failure, based on the following reproaches: - entrenchment in a statist ideology, based on increased public spending and interventionism, without attention to real management capacity and fiscal impact. - organizational sectarianism due to the departure of non-unconditional leaders. - chaotic and erratic campaign, dominated by the proliferation of messages, lack of focus on a clear and convincing proposal, fight of egos and poor communication skills. - underlying anti-Semitism, an issue that generated abundant controversy during the summer without completely disappearing, which would have damaged the ethical image of the party.
In The New Statesman (publication located to the left of The Guardian. The writer and documentary filmmaker Paul Mason dissects Corbyn's errors and clumsiness and calls for Iraq Telegram Number Data convergence not only between the different currents of the party, but also with the liberal center to stop the national-populists in the municipal elections next spring. The aligned sectors that dominate the parliamentary bloc, more or less with Blairism , feel mistreated by Corbyn since , admit that the internal disputes over Brexit have influenced the result (it would be impossible to deny it), but they downplay this factor or They consider it secondary to the leadership style.
The moderates point to Corbyn as responsible for the failure, based on the following reproaches: - entrenchment in a statist ideology, based on increased public spending and interventionism, without attention to real management capacity and fiscal impact. - organizational sectarianism due to the departure of non-unconditional leaders. - chaotic and erratic campaign, dominated by the proliferation of messages, lack of focus on a clear and convincing proposal, fight of egos and poor communication skills. - underlying anti-Semitism, an issue that generated abundant controversy during the summer without completely disappearing, which would have damaged the ethical image of the party.